Abstract Aiming to translate, culturally adapt, and psychometrically evaluate the Person-centred Practice Inventory - Staff (PCPI-S) for Portuguese healthcare professionals, this methodological study was conducted sequentially in two phases. Phase I followed the 10-steps recommendations from the ISPOR taskforce for translation and cultural adaptation of patient reported outcome measures. Phase II comprised a quantitative cross-sectional virtual survey of the translated PCPI-S with healthcare professionals, who were reached through snowball sampling from both primary and specialized care settings. The psychometric properties of the PCPI-S were determined by assessing reliability and construct validity. A sample of 304 healthcare professionals participated in Phase II. Ceiling effects were found. The overall internal consistency was excellent (> 0.9). The confirmatory factor analysis showed a good model fit after minor modifications, revealing construct validity, and supporting the theoretical framework. In conclusion, the three-factorial model of PCPI-S adjusted to the studied sample is a valid and reliable instrument to assess the perceptions of healthcare professionals on person-centred practice in various Portuguese clinical contexts. Considering the ceiling effects, the effect of social desirability should be explored.

Resumo Com o objetivo de traduzir, adaptar culturalmente e avaliar psicometricamente o Inventário para a Prática Centrada na Pessoa para profissionais de saúde (PCPI-S) em diversos contextos de prestação de cuidados, este estudo metodológico realizou-se em duas fases sequenciais. A Fase I seguiu as recomendações de dez etapas da taskforce da ISPOR para tradução e adaptação cultural de medidas de resultados auto reportados. A Fase II incluiu um estudo cross-sectional do PCPI-S traduzido com profissionais de saúde, que foram alcançados por meio de amostragem snowball em contextos de cuidados primários e diferenciados. A psicometria do PCPI-S foi analisada pela avaliação da confiabilidade e validade de construto. Uma amostra de 304 profissionais de saúde participou da Fase II. Efeitos de teto foram encontrados. A consistência interna geral foi excelente (> 0,9). A análise fatorial confirmatória mostrou um bom ajuste do modelo e validade de construto, refletindo o referencial teórico. Concluindo, o modelo tri-fatorial do PCPI-S ajustado à amostra estudada é um instrumento válido e fiável para avaliar as percepções dos profissionais de saúde sobre a prática centrada na pessoa em vários contextos de cuidados portugueses. Considerando os efeitos teto, a desejabilidade social deve ser explorada.

ABSTRACT Background: Person-centred practices - following national and international developments in health-care policies - have become a key approach in healthcare. The Person-Centred Practice Inventory - Staff is an instrument based on the theoretical framework Person-Centred Practice that focuses on the staff’s perspective and how they experience person-centred practices. Here, the aim of this study is to obtain the first Spanish version of the PCPI-S translated and adapted into the Spanish context. Methods: The translation and adaptation of the instrument followed the Translation and Cultural Adaptation of Patient Reported Outcomes Measures - Principles of Good Practice, which included a consulting session with experts. Content validation measures on clarity and relevance were assessed for every item (I-CVI) and the survey as a whole (S-CVI/Ave). Results: No major difficulties were registered to reach an agreement on the 12 items that needed to be clarified. Regarding clarity and relevance. The validity index per item (I-CVI) obtained excellent scores for clarity in 53 items and for relevance in 59; the S-CVI/Ave showed excellent results (≥90). Conclusions: This first version of the Person-Centred Practice Inventory - Staff instrument adapted to the Spanish context is conceptually and semantically equivalent to the original one. This valuable tool will be of great help to identify the perception of healthcare professionals on person-centred practices.

RESUMEN Fundamento: El Cuidado Centrado en la Persona (CCP) se ha convertido en un tema central dentro del ámbito sanitario acorde con las políticas de salud nacionales e internacionales. El Person Centred Practice Inventory Staff (PCPI-S) es un instrumento basado en el modelo teórico Person-Centred Practice Framework que evalúa la percepción que tienen los profesionales de la salud sobre una práctica centrada en la persona. El objetivo del estudio es obtener la primera versión española del PCPI-S traducido y adaptado a nuestro contexto español. Método: Se llevó a cabo una traducción y adaptación cultural del instrumento utilizando la guía Translation and Cultural Adaptation of Patient Reported Outcomes Measures - Principles of Good Practice (PGP) que incluyó una sesión con expertos. También se realizó una validación de contenido de la claridad y relevancia de cada ítem (I-CVI), así como del cuestionario total (S-CVI/Ave). Resultados: No se encontraron dificultades para llegar a un consenso en los doce ítems que necesitaron ser clarificados. El índice de validez de contenido por ítem (I-CVI) obtuvo una puntuación excelente para claridad en 53 ítems, y para relevancia en 59; el índice de validez de contenido del cuestionario (S-CVI/Ave) mostró resultados excelentes (≥90). Conclusiones:. Se ha obtenido la primera versión del PCPI-S adaptada al español, conceptual y semánticamente equivalente al cuestionario original. Este instrumento permitirá identificar la percepción que tienen los profesionales de la salud sobre una práctica centrada en la persona.

Abstract Aiming to translate, culturally adapt, and psychometrically evaluate the Person-centred Practice Inventory - Staff (PCPI-S) for Portuguese healthcare professionals, this methodological study was conducted sequentially in two phases. Phase I followed the 10-steps recommendations from the ISPOR taskforce for translation and cultural adaptation of patient reported outcome measures. Phase II comprised a quantitative cross-sectional virtual survey of the translated PCPI-S with healthcare professionals, who were reached through snowball sampling from both primary and specialized care settings. The psychometric properties of the PCPI-S were determined by assessing reliability and construct validity. A sample of 304 healthcare professionals participated in Phase II. Ceiling effects were found. The overall internal consistency was excellent (> 0.9). The confirmatory factor analysis showed a good model fit after minor modifications, revealing construct validity, and supporting the theoretical framework. In conclusion, the three-factorial model of PCPI-S adjusted to the studied sample is a valid and reliable instrument to assess the perceptions of healthcare professionals on person-centred practice in various Portuguese clinical contexts. Considering the ceiling effects, the effect of social desirability should be explored.

Resumo Com o objetivo de traduzir, adaptar culturalmente e avaliar psicometricamente o Inventário para a Prática Centrada na Pessoa para profissionais de saúde (PCPI-S) em diversos contextos de prestação de cuidados, este estudo metodológico realizou-se em duas fases sequenciais. A Fase I seguiu as recomendações de dez etapas da taskforce da ISPOR para tradução e adaptação cultural de medidas de resultados auto reportados. A Fase II incluiu um estudo cross-sectional do PCPI-S traduzido com profissionais de saúde, que foram alcançados por meio de amostragem snowball em contextos de cuidados primários e diferenciados. A psicometria do PCPI-S foi analisada pela avaliação da confiabilidade e validade de construto. Uma amostra de 304 profissionais de saúde participou da Fase II. Efeitos de teto foram encontrados. A consistência interna geral foi excelente (> 0,9). A análise fatorial confirmatória mostrou um bom ajuste do modelo e validade de construto, refletindo o referencial teórico. Concluindo, o modelo tri-fatorial do PCPI-S ajustado à amostra estudada é um instrumento válido e fiável para avaliar as percepções dos profissionais de saúde sobre a prática centrada na pessoa em vários contextos de cuidados portugueses. Considerando os efeitos teto, a desejabilidade social deve ser explorada.

Resumen Fundamento: El cuidado centrado en la persona se ha convertido en un enfoque esencial a nivel global que pretende dar respuesta a todas las dimensiones que afectan a los complejos procesos de la atención sanitaria. El Person Centred Practice Framework (PCPF), desarrollado por McCormack y McCance facilita que los equipos multidisciplinares puedan entender y operativizar todas las dimensiones que participan en el desarrollo de una atención centrada en la persona. El objetivo del estudio fue obtener la primera versión española del marco PCPF traducida y adaptada a nuestro contexto español. Método: La traducción y adaptación transcultural del PCPF se acometió utilizando la guía Translation and cultural adaptation process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures, que incluye una sesión con expertos. Además, se realizó una validación de contenido de la claridad y la relevancia de cada dominio. Resultados: No se encontraron dificultades relevantes para llegar a un acuerdo en la mayoría de los términos que necesitaron ser clarificados, a excepción del término Estar presente con pleno reconocimiento del otro, que fue el más complejo de traducir y adaptar culturalmente. Respecto a la relevancia y claridad, el índice de validez de contenido por constructo (I-CVI) y del marco global (S-CVI/Ave) mostraron excelentes resultados (≥0,90). Conclusiones: Se ha obtenido una versión adaptada al español clara, relevante y conceptualmente equivalente al marco PCPF original. La disponibilidad de este marco en español facilitará una mejor comprensión de la práctica centrada en la persona y favorecerá la implementación de este enfoque en la práctica clínica.

Abstract Background: Person-centered care has become a key global approach that seeks to provide answers to all factors of the complex health care-related processes. This has led to the development of theoretical frameworks that represent the components of person-centered care. The internationally recognized Person-Centred Practice Framework (PCPF) (McCormack and McCance) allows multidisciplinary teams to understand and operationalize the dimensions for the development of person-centered care. The aim of this study was to obtain the first Spanish version of the PCPF translated and adapted to the Spanish context. Methods: We translated the PCPF following the Translation and cultural adaptation process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures guidelines. A consulting session with experts was part of the process and content validation on clarity and relevance for each domain was performed. Results: We encountered no significant difficulties to reach agreements on most of the terms except for Having a sympathetic presence. Not only was a complex term to translate but also to trans-culturally adapt. Regarding relevance and clarity, the content index by construct (I-CVI) and the global framework (S-CVI/Ave) were consistent with their original counterparts (≥0.90). Conclusions: The adapted Spanish version is clear, significant, and conceptually equivalent to the original PCPF. It will allow a better comprehension of the person-centered practice framework in the Spanish context and facilitate the implementation of this approach in clinical practices.